1. The temperatures on Venus and Mars risen even more than they have here on earth over the same period. If the issue is human based industrial CO2 emissions why is same happening on these other planets where there is no human activity? Why does the AGW narrative resolutely ignore the overall solar trend?
2. The current temperatures on earth as still lower than they were prior to the Maunder minimum. We used to be able to make wine in England. Grapes do not grow in Britain now. Prior to the Maunder minimum, agriculture was possible in Greenland. Why does the AGW narrative resolutely ignore the fact that global temperatures today are lower than they where in Medieval and Roman times?
3. It is the warming trend since the Maunder minimum that is pointed to as 'proof' of AGW. The problem is that the trend began BEFORE the industrial age. The trend has not accelerated. If anything the 'pause' in AGW has climatologists stumped. Why does the AGW narrative insist on beginning its trend analysis from the middle of the Maunder minimum?
No comments:
Post a Comment